A flowchart showing all the stages of a China International Economic and Trade Commission (CIETAC) arbitration, based on the CIETAC Arbitration Rules CIETAC Arbitration Rules · CIETAC Arbitration Rules · CIETAC Arbitration Rules (These rules entered into force on 1 January ). The Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Commission [hereafter, the “Arbitration Rules”], which took effect on 1 May, , apply to this case.

Author: Mezragore Zolotaur
Country: Italy
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 4 January 2005
Pages: 225
PDF File Size: 4.45 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.15 Mb
ISBN: 251-6-93994-649-5
Downloads: 51935
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nijinn

Article 84 Coming into Force. The Contract did not stipulate conditions for termination. Key CISG provisions at issue: The [Buyer] alleged that the [Seller]’s counterclaims are based on the fact that the contract ML is real, valid and effective and that the contract has been actually performed.

From 1, to 2, The Arbitration Tribunal held the first oral hearing at the place where the South China Sub-Commission is located at 9 a. Failure of either party to perform a partial award shall neither affect the arbitral proceedings nor prevent the arbitral tribunal from making the final award.

Article 61 Notice of Oral Hearing. Though the [Seller] has asked dules times, the [Buyer] has not paid the remaining amount.

The Chairman of CIETAC shall make a final decision on whether or not an arbitrator should be replaced with or without stating the reasons. From 1, to 5, Article 57 Notice of Arbitration.

Article 25 Number of Arbitrators. The [Buyer] and the [Seller] failed to resolve the dispute by negotiation. The [Seller] had full knowledge of the Bureau’s function. The traveling fees for a total of RMB 20, for two oral hearings are true.

The [Seller] alleged that some explosion accidents in other factories were caused by natural gas this was not verified. This memorandum stated that the unpaid amount should “be paid by the [Buyer] in foreign currency before 15 December The above written correction shall form a part of the arbitral award and shall be subject to the provisions in Paragraphs 4 to 9 of Article 49 of these Rules.


Article 5 of the contract stipulated that the place of discharge was Beijing, China International Exhibition Center the low-tax zone. A party shall be deemed to have waived its right to object where it knows or should 2005 known that any provision of, or requirement under, these Rules has not been complied with and yet rulds in or proceeds with the arbitral proceedings without promptly and explicitly submitting its objection in writing to such non-compliance.

The [Seller] shall assure that the goods are made from first-class material, brand new, unused and meet the specifications and function stipulated in the contract. According to article 72 of Opinion of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Implementation of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China, a contract is grossly unconscionable if “one party made use of his dominant position ryles the technology and information or lack of experience of the other party and thereby caused the violation of the principle of fairness and equivalence.

Where a case is examined by way of an oral hearing, the evidence shall be produced at the oral hearing and may be examined by the parties. Even if the quality of the furnace originally satisfied the requirements stipulated in the Contract, the [Seller] should bear the liabilities if its negligence caused the explosion when testing and adjusting the furnace.

CIETAC Arbitration Rules | Practical Law

Effective as of January 1, The [Buyer] appointed Mr. To reduce the price according to the extent of the defect and damage of the goods and the loss of the [Buyer]. Article 39 2 CISG states:. Therefore, when the [Seller] started running the furnace, it showed that the natural gas, pressure and filter satisfied the requirements of the furnace. See details in the rulees, fifty-eight pages in total. The arbitral tribunal has the power to determine in the arbitral award the arbitration fees and other expenses ciegac be paid by the parties to CIETAC.

The furnace delivered by the [Seller] did not comply with the Contract. However, the [Seller] did not submit sufficient evidence to sustain this allegation.


CIETAC arbitration (2005 Rules): flowchart

Both parties signed a memorandum on 30 December to revise the payment condition. Article 1 The Arbitration Commission. Where the parties 20055 agreed on the language of arbitration, such language shall be the language of the Emergency Arbitrator Procedures. In the absence of such an agreement or where such agreement is in conflict with a mandatory provision of the law, the arbitral tribunal shall determine the law applicable to the merits of the rrules.

If a party fails to file a challenge within the above time period, it may not subsequently challenge the arbitrator on 20005 basis of the matters disclosed by the arbitrator.

Article 42 Examination of Evidence. The Arbitration Court shall notify the parties of the above circumstances. The time period for the additional party to submit its Statement of Defense and Statement of Counterclaim shall start counting from the date of its receipt of the Notice of Joinder.

First, in terms of facts, Xinjiang Bureau concluded that the [Seller] was liable for the explosion without verifying the cause of the explosion or correctly describing the basic facts. The contract also had a fifty-eight page annex, which included the goods’ name, quantity, specifications, technical parameter, instructions and the list of spare parts. Counterclaim, if any, shall also be filed with evidence and supporting documents within such time cietqc.

The parties shall perform the arbitral award within the time period specified in the cietax. The arbitral tribunal has the power to decide whether to accept a counterclaim or a Statement of Defense submitted after the expiration of the above time period.

The Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Commission [hereafter, the “Arbitration Rules”], which took effect on 1 May,apply to this case.